Showing posts with label safety. Show all posts
Showing posts with label safety. Show all posts

Thursday, September 19, 2013

Sunscreen Smackdown

I hate sunscreens. My eldest hates it so much that sometimes she would rather stay home than apply it.  She would rather wear a long sleeve shirt and long pants in the hot sun than wear sunblock.  If you decide to go this route, I can recommend the White Sierra Gobi SPF 30 shirt to do the trick, as it is loose fitting, wicking, and dries quickly, rather than the typical rash guard shirts.  My kids love theirs.

So which is the best sunscreen? Four criteria here:
  1. Best sun protection; 
  2. Safe ingredients;
  3. Best feeling on the skin; and
  4. Best value
Some day I'll make up a table and put it all together for you, to figure out which sunscreen is the best overall, but today is not that day.  This post has been sitting in my drafts folder for three months and I've realized now that I'm never going to get around to it.  If you manage to create a table with the sunscreen names, protection factor, price, EWG rating, and Amazon rating (for how consumers like how it feels on the skin), please send the link to me!  The fact that there are a gazillion different types of sunscreens, and multiples from the same manufacturer, leads to a Goliath worthy task.

Now, I'm thinking this is the Impossible Dream, getting a sunscreen which rates well for all of the four criteria.  So it is up to you which factors are the most important and the weighting you give to them to determine the overall winner.

Here is a discussion of the four criteria and what I've come up with after some obsessive research.

Best Protection from UVA and UVB

For best sun protection, I turn to Consumer Reports. Unfortunately, the SPF does not tell you how well protected you are from UVA and UVB rays. "Most of the sunscreens we tested provided less protection than the SPF listed on the container," Sue Booth of Consumer Reports said.

Sky-high SPF numbers are no measure of product effectiveness. A sunscreen’s sun protection factor, or SPF, measures its ability to screen skin burning UV rays, primarily UVB rays. The SPF value does not reflect the product’s ability to filter out UVA rays that, according to a growing body of evidence, cause skin damage, immune suppression and possibly melanoma. Studies show that high-SPF users are exposed to as many or more ultraviolet rays than those who use lower-SPF products. Experts believe that people get a false sense of security from those big numbers, don’t apply enough sunscreen, wait too long before reapplying and spend too much time in bright sun. 
About 1 in 7 beach and sport sunscreens is labeled with SPF values greater than 50+. The FDA has proposed to limit SPF claims to 50+ but has not issued a regulation to that end. European manufacturers are bound by a European Union rule that caps SPF claims at 50+.

If you just want the best SPF sun protection for value, buy the EQ Sport SPF 60 sunscreen from Walmart. At $7 for 237 mL, it's a steal. I am not recommending any spray on sunscreens because they are still researching the danger of that application method, given that the fumes may be inhaled.

Here are the top four according to Consumer Reports in 2010:
  • Up & Up Sport Continuous SPF 30, by Target. It is administered by spray and costs $0.88 per ounce.
  • Walgreens Sport Continuous SPF 50. Also a spray. Cost, $1.33 per ounce.
  • Banana Boat Sport Performance Continuous SPF 30. Spray. Cost, $1.60 per ounce.
  • Aveeno Continuous Protection SPF 50. Spray. Cost, $2 an ounce.

Ranking below those are:
  • Coppertone UltraGuard Continuous 70+ SPF, costing $1.62 per ounce. Spray.
  • No-Ad with Aloe and Vitamin, 45 SPF scale, costing $0.59 per ounce. Lotion.
  • Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Body Mist with Helioplex, 45 SPF, costing $1.90 per ounce. Spray.
  • Badger, 30 SPF, costing $4.83 per ounce. Lotion.
  • La Roche-Posay Anthelios 40 with Mexoryl SX, 40 SPF, costing $18.82 per ounce. Cream.
  • Avon Skin-So-Soft Bug Guard Plus IR3535 Expedition, 30 SPF, costing $3.50 per ounce. Pump spray.
  • Burt’s Bees Chemical-Free with Hemp Seed Oil, 30 SPF, costing $4 per ounce. Lotion.

Safest Ingredient Sunscreen

For safe ingredients, I turn to Environmental Working Group's extensive ratings. Here is where I save you the work. I've cross referenced the Consumer Reports list with the EWG ratings for you.
0-2: Low Hazard
3-6: Moderate Hazard
7-10: High Hazard

Here they are ranked from best to worst. Click on the rating number to see the full description of the hazards.

For the Consumer Reports top rated sunscreens:

  • Up & Up Sport Continuous SPF 30, by Target. It is administered by spray and costs $0.88 per ounce. 7
  • Walgreens Sport Continuous SPF 50. Also a spray. Cost, $1.33 per ounce. 7 for the 15 SPF spray version.
  • Banana Boat Sport Performance Continuous SPF 30. Spray. Cost, $1.60 per ounce. 7.
  • Aveeno Continuous Protection SPF 50. Spray. Cost, $2 an ounce. 7
For the next to top rated sunscreens:
  • Coppertone UltraGuard Continuous rated a 70+ in SPF, costing $1.62 per ounce. Spray. 7.
  • No-Ad with Aloe and Vitamin rated 45 on the SPF scale, costing $0.59 per ounce. Lotion. 7
  • Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Body Mist with Helioplex had a 45 SPF, costing $1.90 per ounce. Spray.
  • Badger scored a PDF of 30, costing $4.83 per ounce. Lotion. 7.
  • La Roche-Posay Anthelios 40 with Mexoryl SX, scored a 40 SPF, costing $18.82 per ounce. Cream. 2.
  • Avon Skin-So-Soft Bug Guard Plus IR3535 Expedition scores a SPF of 30, costing $3.50 per ounce. Pump spray. No EWG data available.
  • Burt’s Bees Chemical-Free with Hemp Seed Oil got a 30 SPF, costing $4 per ounce. Lotion. No EWG data available, but the Baby Bee Sunscreen Stick has a rating of 1.
Note that EWG has its own measurement of UVA and UVB protection, and the list appears to be kept up to date.

Best Feeling Sunscreen

I hate the feeling of greasiness and my skin breaking out, so I turned to the recommendations given by Well and Good NYC. Most of the sunscreens on the list were prohibitively expensive. The least expensive one was by Goddess Garden, Facial Sunscreen SPF 30, at $18 for 3.4 ounces.

The highest ratings on Amazon for natural sunscreens were for:
  1. Burnout Kids Physical Sunscreen SPF 30, $5.29.
  2. Sprunk-Jansen ThinkBaby Sunscreen SPF 50+, $4.80.
  3. Vanicream Sunscreen for Sensitive Skin, $2.80.  4.5*, EWG 2
  4. ThinkSport Kid Safe Sunscreen Thinkbaby Livestrong SPF 50+, $5.25.  5* 
  5. Thinksport Livestrong Sunscreen SPF 50+, Water Resistant, $3.67.  4.5*, EWG 1
  6. Seventh Generation Baby Sunscreen SPF 30, $6.53. 4.5*
  7. Banana Boat Natural Reflect Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50, $2.25, 4.5*, EWG 3
  8. Adorable Baby SPF 30+ Sunscreen Non-Nano Zinc Oxide UVA/UVB, $5.11, 4.5*
  9. Blue Lizard Blue Lizard Australian Sensitive Sunscreen Spf 30 Plus, $4.38, 4*
  10. All Terrain KidSport SPF30 Oxybenzone Disney Phineas and Ferb Free Natural Sunscreen, $3.53, 4*, EWG 2
Best Value Natural Sunscreen

The final consideration is cost. Most experts recommend TWO shot glasses of sunscreen, or around two ounces. Given that many of the sunscreens come in 3-4 ounce containers, it seems they would be finished in only two uses!!!

Not wanting to look up the cost of every single sunscreen listed as a top sunscreen by EWG, I took this shortcut by jumping off the research done by The Daily Green for winners on the EWG list.

The Daily Green listed the 21 Most Affordable Natural Sunscreens, listed in order of cost. Not all of these sunscreens are available in Canada. Cost is listed "per ounce."  My own additions to the list are in bold:
  1. MexiTan and Tropical Sands Sunscreens, $2.19.
  2. Purple Prairie SunStuff Natural Sunscreen, $2.31.
  3. Nature's Gate Mineral Sportblock, $2.34.
  4. Solbar Zinc Sun Protection Cream, $2.46.
  5. Alba Botanica Mineral Sunscreen, $2.50.
  6. Caribbean Solutions SolGuard Biodegradable Sunscreen, $2.67.
  7. Jason Mineral Sunblock, $2.87.
  8. Vanicream Sunscreen for Sensitive Skin, $2.80.
  9. Loving Naturals Sunscreen, $2.94.
  10. Goddess Garden Natural Sunscreen, $3.00
  11. Earth's Best Mineral Sunblock, $3.11.
  12. Aubrey Organics Natural Sun Saving Face Sunscreen, $3.46.
  13. All-Terrain Aquasport Sunscreen, $3.54.
  14. MelanSol Natural Sunscreen, $3.99.
  15. Beyond Coastal Natural Sunscreen, $4.00.
  16. Episencial Sunny Sunscreen, $4.25.
  17. Badger All Natural Sunscreen, $4.69.
  18. Sprunk-Jansen ThinkBaby Sunscreen SPF 50+, $4.80.
  19. Blue Lizard Australian Sunscreen, $4.96.
  20. Green Beaver Non-Whitening Fragrance Free Sunscreen SPF 30, $5.26.
  21. Burnout Kids Physical Sunscreen SPF 30, $5.29.
  22. Kabana Green Screen Natural Sunscreen, $5.95.
  23. True Natural Cosmetics All Natural Sunscreen, $6.00.
  24. Climb On! Mineral Sunblock, $6.00.







Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Do You Want Cancer with your Candy?


Today at school pickup I found both of my kids lined up at the infernal ice cream truck that shows up and parks in front of the school when the weather warms.  They had just purchased a product from Popsicle called "Shots."

I bluntly told the kids that they will get cancer if they continue to eat things with artificial colours.  Yeah, okay, I admit that I was guilty of a bit of frothing at the mouth over the top mommyism, but there was some truth there.  When I got home, I did some research on this.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest says that food dyes pose the risk of cancer, hyperactivity in children, and allergies.

The three most widely used dyes, Red 40, Yellow 5, and Yellow 6, are contaminated with known carcinogens, says CSPI. Another dye, Red 3, has been acknowledged for years by the Food and Drug Administration to be a carcinogen, yet is still in the food supply.

Despite those concerns, each year manufacturers pour about 15 million pounds of eight synthetic dyes into our foods. Per capita consumption of dyes has increased five-fold since 1955, thanks in part to the proliferation of brightly colored breakfast cereals, fruit drinks, and candies pitched to children.

“These synthetic chemicals do absolutely nothing to improve the nutritional quality or safety of foods, but trigger behavior problems in children and, possibly, cancer in anybody,” said CSPI executive director Michael F. Jacobson, co-author of the 58-page report, “Food Dyes: A Rainbow of Risks.” “The Food and Drug Administration should ban dyes, which would force industry to color foods with real food ingredients, not toxic petrochemicals.”

Blue 1, Red 40, Yellow 5, and Yellow 6 have long been known to cause allergic reactions in some people. CSPI says that while those reactions are not common, they can be serious and provide reason enough to ban those dyes. Furthermore, numerous studies have demonstrated that dyes cause hyperactivity in children.

But the biggest concern is cancer. Back in 1985, the acting commissioner of the FDA said that Red 3, one of the lesser-used dyes, “has clearly been shown to induce cancer” and was “of greatest public health concern.” However, Secretary of Agriculture John R. Block pressed the Department of Health and Human Services not to ban the dye, and he apparently prevailed—notwithstanding the Delaney Amendment that forbids the use of in foods of cancer-causing color additives. Each year about 200,000 pounds of Red 3 are poured into such foods as Betty Crocker’s Fruit Roll-Ups and ConAgra’s Kid Cuisine frozen meals. Since 1985 more than five million pounds of the dye have been used.

Tests on lab animals of Blue 1, Blue 2, Green 3, Red 40, Yellow 5, and Yellow 6 showed signs of causing cancer or suffered from serious flaws, said the consumer group. Yellow 5 also caused mutations, an indication of possible carcinogenicity, in six of 11 tests.

In addition, according to the report, FDA tests show that the three most-widely used dyes, Red 40, Yellow 5, and Yellow 6, are tainted with low levels of cancer-causing compounds, including benzidine and 4-aminobiphenyl in Yellow 5. However, the levels actually could be far higher, because in the 1990s the FDA and Health Canada found a hundred times as much benzidine in a bound form that is released in the colon, but not detected in the routine tests of purity conducted by the FDA.


I decided to look up Red 40 at a helpful website of the same name and find out if it was in any of the foods that my family eats.  Unfortunately, it was, including the Popsicle brand, although "shots" were not mentioned.  It did list other frozen treats by Popsicle that are brightly coloured.

Here are some of the foods we sometimes eat in our family that contain Red 40:

Froot Loops (We eat it only on vacations)
McCormick Food Colours (not sure whether this is the brand we buy)
Sprinkles (on Tim Horton's doughnuts and Purdy's ice cream)
Twizzlers (at the theatre)
Starburst
M&Ms
Skittles
Candy Canes
Bubbalicious
Trident
Smarties
Minute Maid Orange Soda
Schweppes Raspberry Gingerale
Gatorade Fruit Punch
Lipton Brisk Iced Tea
Ocean Spray Ruby Red Grapefruit Juice
Kraft Barbecue Sauce
Kraft Catalina Dressing
Frito Lay Doritos
Betty Crocker Fruit by the Foot (A&W kids' packs)
Hershey's Strawberry Syrup
Kellogg's Nutrigrain Cereal Bars
Jell-O Instant Pudding Chocolate
Mott's Fruitsation Apple Sauce Strawberry
Children's Tylenol Cold Liquid Grape
Bayer Children's Flintstones Multivitamin
Centrum Performance Multivitamin

That was only one of the potential cancer causing food dyes.  What about the rest of them?

Moral of the story:

Avoid buying processed foods, drinks, and drugs.









Monday, November 5, 2012

Animal Jam Game Review: Addiction for Kids


This is my parent review of Animal Jam.

What is Animal Jam and How We Were Sucked Into It

We subscribed to National Geographic for Kids magazine to raise funds to build our school playground.  In it were advertisements for "Animal Jam," an online game with multiple stranger players, simple games like tic tac toe with rewards of jewellery, hats, clothing for your avatar, an animal.  Along the way your child is supposed to learn facts.  Now, this may be the true intention, but upon observing my child play, she did not learn much if anything except materialism.  She became obsessed with acquiring and possessing, and trading items with other players.

The child explores around the Animal Jam world taking part in games with players from all over the world.  Currently Animal Jam boasts SIX MILLION players, and counting.  I watched a YouTube presentation by one of the companies profiting from this phenomenon--Clark Stacey, CEO of Smart Bomb Interactive, called "Animal Jam: Why Chocolate Covered Broccoli Sucks But Zucchini Bread Doesn't."  In it, he explained the success of Animal Jam.  He boasted that the average Animal Jam user spends 75 minutes per session, saying this was evidence that his website was doing something right.

Is Animal Jam Safe for My Kids?

Yes, it was doing something "right."  Animal Jam is an MMORPG: a "massively multiplayer online role playing game."  Sure, the kids are playing with cute animal avatars instead of with overmuscular armoured men and women typical of other role playing games, but it is an MMORPG nonetheless.

The reason why Animal Jam is successful is twofold.  One, parents consider it safe.  Two, it is highly addictive.

When my kids first asked to play Animal Jam, I researched whether Animal Jam was safe.  I do not want my child interacting with sweaty naked fat old men masquerading as little innocent kids.  Parents consider it safe because it is a National Geographic creation and parents can monitor players' activities through the parent dashboard.  There are moderators.

I was leery of letting our kids play any video games as I consider them a waste of time when they could be spending their hours reading, doing creative activities, or physical activities instead.  While I was not at home, they had their first Animal Jam session and then they were hooked.

Animal Jam is Virtual Cocaine for the Under 10 Crowd

What makes Animal Jam "unsafe" is that is is addictive.  Clearly, MMORPGs are addictive.  A study of 100 university students showed disturbing data.  I love this study so much, I am going to quote big chunks from this article, "Are MMORPGs 'addictive?'" written by Dave Munger in June 2008, since I'm afraid the link will no longer work in the future:


They played the games on their own time, in a campus “game laboratory” (or in an arcade for the arcade group). The only requirement was that they play the game for at least an hour a week. The arcade group could play any of the games in the arcade; one group played Gauntlet: Dark Legacy on a PlayStation 2; one group played Diablo II on a computer, and the final group played the MMORPG Dark Age of Camelot. So did the type of game had any impact on how much the games were played? You bet it did — here are the results:



The MMORPG group spent significantly more time playing Dark Age of Camelot in the final week of play than any of the other groups spent playing their games — an average of 14.4 hours! Remember, these groups were randomly assigned, and there was no difference in game-playing time among groups at the start of the study. But even if the students spent more time with the MMORPG, that doesn’t mean they’re addicted to it. Were other aspects of their lives affected by this increase in game-playing? Yes, they were. Take a look at this graph:

Sleep quality was significantly worse in the MMORPG group than the other groups, and the participants said the game interfered with their academics (although their actual academic performance didn’t suffer compared to the other groups). Yet the MMORPG group was significantly more likely than the other groups to say they planned to continue playing the game after the study was complete.
So is this behavior addictive? Smyth doesn’t offer an assessment, but the fact that the MMORPG appears to be negatively impacting several areas of these students’ lives — and that they continue to play on despite this — suggest it might be. 

Ironically, this article is available on Science Blog, a website in partnership with National Geographic!  The dangers of MMORPGs have not been explored extensively as much attention has been focussed on the dangers of console or computer games.  This article, "The Reality of MMORPG Addiction" noted some tragic outcomes of this real addiction.  I am not suggesting that Animal Jam play will lead to suicide, but this is here to show the dangers of MMORPG addiction.  I also wonder whether I am priming my developing kids' brains for serious adult addictive behaviours later by allowing them to play this addictive game at such a young age.


...as MMORPGs continue to become more popular, the worry of games consuming a person’s life to the point that it can be classified as an addiction grows. There have already been several reports of people not only losing their jobs and neglecting their families, but even suffering serious health consequences due to excessive gaming habits.

The media aren’t short on horror stories about online game addictions: According to the BBC, a Korean man collapsed and died after playing Starcraft for more than 50 hours, stopping only for short periods of sleep and bathroom breaks. A 13-year-old boy committed suicide by jumping off a building to honor the heroes in an online game. A 3-month old baby starved to death, after her parents left the house to visit an Internet cafĂ© and nurture their virtual child.

Addiction to online games, and especially addiction to MMORPGs, is no longer a joke, but a verifiable condition that has left a trail of bodies in its wake.

Update, April 14, 2013:  While responding to a commenter below, I researched whether computer time itself was problematic for young children.  I came across this article from the Huffington Post:


Roughly 1 in 10 children who play video games are at risk of becoming pathologically addicted to them, found a new study published in the journal Pediatrics.
That means for every classroom of 30 kids, three of them could develop a hardcore digital addiction that boosts the risk of depression, social phobia and poor school performance, the study found.
Over a two-year span, researchers from the U.S., Hong Kong and Singapore studied the video game habits of 3,000 Singaporean children from grades 3, 4, 7 and 8.
Kids who averaged 31 or more hours of gameplay a week were classified as pathological or "obsessive" gamers and were determined more likely to develop serious mental health issues.
Inclined to believe video game addiction is just a passing phase? WebMD reports that 84 percent of students who were considered addicts when the study began were still addicted two years later.
Still, such findings are preliminary. U.S. News reports:
Although pathological video gaming appears to share a number of characteristics with other addictive behaviors, such as pathological gambling, the researchers noted that "pathological gaming" is not yet an established psychological disorder.



Addiction Behaviours

In my household, I noted some interesting addictive behaviours particularly in my eight year old.  Yes, eight years old.  The target, according the aforementioned YouTube presentation, is the under 10 crowd.  A crowd with limited reasoning abilities, and, I daresay, little control over their impulses.

She began rising from her upstairs bed after my husband and I went downstairs (bedtime is 8:30 pm), to search for our tablet Playbooks in our bedroom to play Animal Jam into the night.  Then once we discovered this and locked the tablets when not in use, she started waking up before dawn to play Animal Jam on our desktop computer.  She had a pact with her older sister to wake each other up to play at night.  In the morning, I would find the lid closed when we had left it open.  So we started locking the desktop computer at night.

Since Animal Jam came into our lives, my youngest asks every day to play.  At first I would only allow her to play on weekends, after her homework was done.  My most recent attempt to control her time on the game involved an exchange of 1:1 for piano practice or 2:1 for reading, that is 2 hours of reading for one hour of Animal Jam.  This has worked in cutting down her time substantially.

I discovered that my kids will lie to cover up their clandestine Animal Jam play.  They will play Animal Jam to the exclusion of all other activities including eating.  They prefer it to watching a movie, going for a bicycle ride, going to Science World... They will arrange to meet up with their real life friends on Animal Jam after school.  They will spend hours discussing the items they covet, and how to obtain coveted items.

What Educational Aspect?

Since Animal Jam came into our lives, their creative activity has dropped.  They used to enjoy reading and drawing, but now every waking moment is dedicated to thinking about their next Animal Jam fix.  Well, at least this is true of my youngest.  My eldest still prefers reading to Animal Jam, but then again, she has moved out of the target age group recently.

Childhood is such a short time.  I hate to see it wasted for something of very limited and dubious educational value.  I've watched my kids play for extended periods of time, and they do not choose to view the educational material as they don't need to.  It is not part of the game--you need to click on an icon to read educational facts.  They'd rather be earning "gems" by playing games.  Clark Stacey, the presenter on YouTube, gave this advice to other developers at the Casual Connect convention in Seattle: "The key to our recipe is... don't try to educate kids through game play."  He claims to spark their curiosity, but I didn't see any evidence of that, personally.

Animal Jam School of Hard Knocks: A Place to Learn Where to Lie, Cheat, and Steal

Although I have limited their time to no more than one hour a day, it is never enough.

Parents, save yourself while you can and don't let them play Animal Jam in the first place.  You have been warned.  You'll get an amazing babysitter that is "safe" but you will pay a price.  The most troubling aspect is the dishonesty of my children, lying to me to get their fix.  I feel that I've failed as a parent since their morality is my biggest concern, bigger than academic achievement.

The game corrupts them to become materialistic.  In our TV free household, this our main source of corruption.  The kids have been asking me regularly to become "members" to get special items.  So I have to spend real dollars on membership to get these fake prizes.  No thank you.  We've fallen deep enough into the pit.

The worst aspect is that this game centres on acquiring rare items.  What happens is that savvy kids trick other naive kids into lopsided trades to get rare items.  A great life lesson, right?  I watched as another player followed my child's avatar around and asked SIX TIMES to trade for an item she had, offering a crappy item in return.  This went on for a very long time, until my daughter escaped to another room, and she ran when she got there to avoid the other player.

Apparently, Animal Jam is quite profitable.  According to the YouTube video presenter, they are currently beating their projections--"lifetime value" of each subscriber is $48, retention of each of these children is "more than six months", with play sessions of 75 minutes *on average*!  One weekend, I allowed my kids to play without limitation on time, and they certainly proved to me that if I do not limit them, they will play all day long.

And so, after discovering the link between MMORPGs and addiction, this is the end of Animal Jam for this family.  I will still offer a video game, not sure what I can replace cocaine with, but I will have to find something less addictive to wean them off.  I do not appreciate National Geographic marketing this abomination targeting the under 10 crowd.  Something is morally repulsive about that.  I have yet to receive any requests for "further exploration" on animal or conservation topics from my kids' curiosity piqued by this game.

I think I'll skip the playground fundraising magazine subscriptions next time.

(And apologies to you if you are a sweaty fat naked old man.  Not that there's anything wrong with that, being a sweaty fat naked old man.)

And in conclusion... a real life example of the Animal Jam School of Hard Knocks

December 21, 2012 Update:  My daughter is home from school with a fever and she relayed the following sad tale to me.  She shared her Animal Jam password with another player who she trusted and that player stole her pink heart necklace, which is an item which is very difficult to obtain.  She had traded her Freedom Hat for it, which was also a coveted item.  This was a hard lesson for her, about trust being violated, and about thieves and dishonesty.  I also took this opportunity to teach her to never give her password away.  Unfortunately, I also told her not to trust strangers.

I have written to the Animal Jam staff and I will post their response here.  May I again express my disgust for this "game"?  I have already limited to her playing to maybe once a week for short time periods, but she is still asking to play on a regular basis.  She went into a frenzy when she found out her sister was able to play Animal Jam at a friend's house.

December 21, 2012: My email inquiry resulted in the following response, which I will summarize as "Too bad, so sad.  Next time don't give out your password."  Here is the actual response, with the actual answer highlighted among the gobbledygook:

Customer Service 8, Dec 21 16:43 (MST):
Hello,
Thank you for contacting Animal Jam Support Headquarters.
We truly understand your frustration and are sorry to hear about the account issues your child encountered. We want to assure you that it is impossible to gain access to an Animal Jam account via illegal access, we have countless security measures in place. All passwords in Animal Jam as well as payment information is protected by 256-bit encryption, which is the highest AES (Advanced Encryption Status) available. There are 3 ways an account can be compromised:
-The password is shared either in real life or in game
-The "remember me" and/or "remember my password" option is selected on a computer
-The password is simply easy to guess or figure out
If you or your child feel your accounts have been compromised, the first thing you should do is reset all your account passwords. This can be done from your Parent Dashboard or via the main page at
http://www.animaljam.com/
Be sure to select account passwords that will be easy for you remember, but hard for someone else to guess. When creating a new password for your child's account, we recommend choosing one consisting of both letters and numbers that is unrelated to your child's real name or user name. We suggest these guidelines to ensure that the account remains as secure as possible.
For more detailed information on how to change your child's password, click here:
http://help.animaljam.com/entries/20112706.
We want to assure you once again that Animal Jam uses only the highest security measures available to protect its users and product. We truly appreciate you taking the time to let us know about this incident. Unfortunately, we cannot replace any lost or traded items at this time and apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, if a Jammer is found to be breaking the Animal Jam rules, a moderator will take swift and appropriate action on their account. Additionally, remember to NEVER share passwords.
Thank you for taking the time to report this issue to us we will be sure to update you if there is anything more we can do for you.
Sincerely,
Animal Jam HQ

And my daughter's response to all this:  "I trusted her!"  Welcome to the real and brutal world, brought to you by National Geographic.

Update, April 14, 2013:  We've cut out Animal Jam completely.  Things are back to normal for my 8 year old, and life is good for me as a parent as well!  She is currently reading Catching Fire and was in the backyard this week practising with her bow and arrow, which she made herself.  Right now she is drawing a comic strip, and is back to her art work.  She is also playing the piano to accompany her violin playing sister... for fun.  She is in the process of writing a book, based on Animal Jam characters!  Not sure how much of this is from having a TV free or an AJ free environment, though...

My 8 year old niece was exposed to AJ at our home, when she was visiting her cousins.  Before the introduction, I told the kids no, and asked my brother-in-law if it was all right, telling him about our problems with addiction.  He basically blew me off, saying that his daughter would never have any interest in the computer.  A few weeks later, he confessed to me that he is now having problems as she is always asking to go on AJ.  He is a brave person to admit this to me.

Update, May 25, 2014:  I've finally decided to close the comments section.

I still continue to be be surprised by the number of children who take the time to write in, recounting their bad experiences.  There are also a few children who write in "Animal Jam is good!" and there was even one who complained that parents should not control what their children play.

I've also continued to receive posts from adults, most of whom are supportive.  I've also received two angry letters, from adults who do not like me suggesting that the literacy of children is in any way impacted by video game time, with not a shred of evidence offered, just spewing vitriol in personal attacks.  This is an opinion blog, like any other.  I am not going to let them use me as a punching bag to make them feel better about their own choices.  If anything, it smacks of insecurity.

I wrote this particular article as a service to other parents, and their children, to save everyone from the same type of agony I've gone through.  To those angry, insulting parents:  If all you can see is a criticism of your own parenting style, you should think about why you are so angry.  If you feel like you've made all the right choices, then you should be secure enough to ignore my comments as someone who has no idea what she's talking about.  May you find peace.

Update, October 5, 2015

I should really have a new subheading so here it is.

The Animal Jam School of Sex

Many of the commenters have alerted me to the sexual nature of many of the conversations on Animal Jam. Only now has this problem been picked up the mainstream media. Here is a television video explaining how Animal Jam is a playground for sexual predators and where the avatars are used to simulate sex acts, using code words such as "pencil", "stick", "bar", and the like because explicit words are banned from use.

Here is the accompanying article from WNCN TV, in case it gets pulled later:

RIVERVIEW, Fla. (WFLA) – In the game “Animal Jam,” you create an animal avatar in a virtual jungle and talk to other players. But Dawn Allen, of Riverview, believes some players in the game go too far with their graphic, sexually-charged conversations, using code words to avoid detection.“There are filters on there. But still, unless you’re actually saying sex it’s not gonna catch it,” Allen said.
For instance, one avatar says, “He pulls his pencil out.” Another one says he takes off a bar – instead of bra. One says they “start snogging again.”
Animals jump up and down in simulated sex acts.
The game creators do have safeguards in place. Moderators try to catch inappropriate talk. News Channel 8 spotted a pop-up window noting inappropriate language and another banning a user for a day.
But Dawn Allen said kids work around all that. “You can click on that and make the avatar hump and have sex online and let your child watch it,” she said.
Allen is not letting her daughter play Animal Jam anymore and she’d like to see the game pulled. “I’m angry. I am angry because there’s a lot of children out there,” she said.
And, as always, the comments section is filled with child Animal Jam users defending the game. "The mom is acting like jumping is bad WTH" comments one of them. It looks like nobody is going to shut down this game, so it is up to parents to monitor their children.

UPDATE October 11, 2016: Four years later and I am still struggling with video game addiction in my household. My warning is as strong as ever: Animal Jam is a gateway drug for video game addiction. My husband has finally stopped parroting the phrase "everything in moderation" and finally agrees with me that we need to stop video game play entirely to break the addiction cycle.

A newer article on how video game addiction ruins lives is here.

 Dr. Douglas Gentile, one of the world's leading experts on adolescent media addiction, believes that you can measure video game dependency the same way you measure other psychological conditions. Experts combine cues from gambling addicts and substance abusers to diagnose destructive gamers. The disorder even manifests in addiction signifiers such as tolerance, withdrawal, a loss of control, and harm to social or academic pursuits. But Gentile understands the skeptics. He began his research on media addiction in 1999 "largely trying to show that it was wrong."
"I was absolutely sure that video game addiction couldn't be a real thing," he said. Instead, he was converted and is now passionate about attracting attention to pathological gaming.
 Update: February 14, 2017

Media Catching On

CBS's WNCN wrote a short story about the possibility of child predators on Animal Jam.

In the game “Animal Jam,” you create an animal avatar in a virtual jungle and talk to other players. But Dawn Allen, of Riverview, believes some players in the game go too far with their graphic, sexually-charged conversations, using code words to avoid detection.
“There are filters on there. But still, unless you’re actually saying sex it’s not gonna catch it,” Allen said.
For instance, one avatar says, “He pulls his pencil out.” Another one says he takes off a bar – instead of bra. One says they “start snogging again.”
Animals jump up and down in simulated sex acts.
The game creators do have safeguards in place. Moderators try to catch inappropriate talk. News Channel 8 spotted a pop-up window noting inappropriate language and another banning a user for a day.
But Dawn Allen said kids work around all that. “You can click on that and make the avatar hump and have sex online and let your child watch it,” she said.
Allen is not letting her daughter play Animal Jam anymore and she’d like to see the game pulled. “I’m angry. I am angry because there’s a lot of children out there,” she said.

Friday, October 12, 2012

What the Heck is Silver Food Colouring Made Of?

http://www.bonbonsconnexion.com/images/wedding/P29624x_confetti_perles_argent_silver_perls.jpg
Yesterday I supervised a field trip day to a local nature trail with my daughter's class.  What a stressful six hours that was!  Might have something to do with my assigned charge "Jeffrey" running off unexpectedly at every step along the way.  We travelled by foot, train, boat, and bus for transit time of 2.5 hours.  EACH WAY.  On the way back, my daughter purchased silver Cola Balls from a candy shop at Lonsdale Quay.

With my (not) vast knowledge of metals, I wondered what coloured the balls silver?  Silver?  Aluminum?  No matter the alternative, all seemed kind of... scary, and none qualified as what I thought of as food.

My friend Google advised me that nobody ever asked this all important life altering question, soon to be the subject of the Obsessive Researching Mommy's attention.  British sweet shop Baa Humbugs had an ingredient list for Silver Cola Balls:  Sugar, Modified Maize Starch, Gelatine (Bovine), Stearic Acid, Maltodextrin, Flavourings, Colour, E173.

So what is E173?

E numbers are codes for chemicals which be used as food additives in the European Union, according to Wikipedia.  So... E174 is Silver.  But E173 is... wait for it... aluminum.  A check of a Canadian candy, the "Cola Silver Ball" made in Burnaby by Pauline Johnson is made of:

SUGAR, FLAVOUR, COLOR E 173, GELATINE, GLAZING AGENT
CARNAUBA WAX, WHEAT STARCH, GLUCOSE SYRUP

There it is again, that silly E173!

We should really name them, "Aluminum Cola Balls." Doesn't have the same tasty ring, though, I admit.

Somewhere in the depths of my brain, I remember a link between aluminum and Alzheimer's, enough to warrant a frantic phone call to my parents to tell them to STOP using their aluminum cookware. Wikipedia further assures me that my worries are without merit:

"According to the Alzheimer's Society, the medical and scientific opinion is that studies have not convincingly demonstrated a causal relationship between aluminium and Alzheimer's disease.  Nevertheless, some studies, such as those on the PAQUID cohort, cite aluminium exposure as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease. Some brain plaques have been found to contain increased levels of the metal.[83] Research in this area has been inconclusive; aluminium accumulation may be a consequence of the disease rather than a causal agent. In any event, if there is any toxicity of aluminium, it must be via a very specific mechanism, since total human exposure to the element in the form of naturally occurring clay in soil and dust is enormously large over a lifetime.[84][85] Scientific consensus does not yet exist about whether aluminium exposure could directly increase the risk of Alzheimer's disease.[81]"

Aluminum toxicity can be caused when you eat foods containing a high level of aluminum.  Now, as to what amount is "safe?"  The FDA has determined that aluminum used as food additives are generally safe.

And now, the ORM can rest to fight another day.


Monday, March 14, 2011

Radioactive Fallout from Japan and the West Coast

Watching the horrifying news, I would like to think that the nuclear reactors in Japan are *not* headed for meltdown. What are the chances that the jet stream would bring radioactive fallout into my backyard and into the thyroid glands of my young children?

You can find the path of the jet stream here: http://squall.sfsu.edu/crws/jetstream.html

The likelihood of harmful levels of radiation from damaged nuclear reactors in Japan reaching Hawaii or the U.S. West Coast is low, the chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission said Monday.

If you'd like to see a virtually real time reading of radiation across the US, look here http://www.blackcatsystems.com/RadMap/map.html. Canada is just across the border, so it's a good indicator of Canadian conditions as well.

Check for the latest updates here to see if the risk has changed.

As of the writing of this posting, if there is a radiation leak, it will be at ground level, not shot high up into the atmosphere and subsequently carried by the jet stream. So, it will likely be absorbed by the ocean before reaching the West Coast of Canada and the U.S.

Despite all of this, if you do want to protect your children, you can have them take 65 mg of Potassium Iodide (KI) once every 24 hours. You start taking KI at least one hour before you expect to be exposed. Children are most at risk, and if you are over 40, you have the lowest chance of developing thyroid cancer or thyroid injury after contamination with radioactive iodine and a greater chance of having allergic reactions to KI. Adults should take 130 mg.

Mind you, I'm not a doctor, so I'm just regurgitating all the information I've absorbed today regarding the current situation and the remedies.

There has been a massive run on KI throughout the US and locally on the West Coast of Canada. In Canada, you can buy Potassium Iodide at some drug stores or at a local vitamin supplement store. You can pre-order 60 capsules of 65 mg each for $12, or buy 20 tables for $23 online.

The KI only protects again the uptake of radioactive iodine by the thyroid. Thyroid cancer, which is usually quite rare, can be treated quite successfully. The risk of inhaling radioactive iodine is low. The biggest risk is from drinking contaminated milk.

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Eating Lead Paint: It Still Happens



Argh. My 3 year old has eaten the blue paint off her Hello Kitty McDonald's toy. As a concerned mother, I try to email McDonald's Canada to ask whether they know what is in the paint. Pointedly, there is no email address listed anywhere on the McDonald's website. The U.S. has a special email centre, but there are no email centres in any other countries. Hmmm.

Okay, now to the good old telephone. The woman receiving my call silkenly reassures me that all McDonald's toys are thoroughly tested for safety. I tell her that I am worried about the possibility that as the toy is made in China, that there might be lead in the paint. Finally, she says that it is not possible for this to happen in Canada, that lead paint would not be allowed in Canada. I then told her that there have been cases of children's jewellery containing high levels of lead, causing serious health problems in children who suck on their necklaces. If you have a small child, you know that children put everything in their mouths. She finally placated me by saying that she would take my telephone number and make an inquiry about it.

I did a quick internet search to confirm what I had told her. As recently as July 5, 2007, there was a recall of children's jewellery for lead content, http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/recalls/2007/07/childrens_metal_jewelry_recall.html. Here is an article from the American Academy of Pediatrics on a case of lead poisoning from a toy necklace: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/114/4/1096.pdf Also, there was a recall of Thomas the Tank Engine toys only a month ago for lead paint. See http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=11271805 And now, not even Disney goods are safe from dispensing lead paint: http://www.babycenter.com/news/?id=101768&scid=pcbulletin:20070723:0:0:0#story . You'd think it would be common sense for manufacturers to consider making children's toys safe for... children.

It would be naive as to believe that you and your children are protected by the government against hazards so well established as lead poisoning. Cases of actual lead poisoning are not uncommon, and you are foolish to assume that you are protected simply because you live in the U.S. or Canada.
Lead poisoning is a result of the cumulative ingestion of lead, through sources as wide ranging as playground paint chips, old paint in home interiors, lead miniblinds, and... toys and jewellery. A cumulative amount as small as one tenth of a square inch of lead paint (the size of a pencil eraser head), depending on the concentration of lead in the paint, of course, will result in blood levels of lead exceeding what is considered safe in children. "Sustained blood lead levels have been linked with behavior and learning problems, damage to the brain and nervous system, slowed growth, and hearing problems."-- Consumer Product Safety Commission.
Conclusion to the story: Beryl from McDonald's called me back the same day that I made my inquiry and said, "I'm happy to advise you that there is no metal in the paint. This becomes a part of the testing that has to meet all standards set for Canada by the safety commission." I told her about Thomas the Tank Engine, and she asked me whether the recall was for Canada. Yes, it was. My friend's Thomas toys were part of the recall, and the toys were purchased in Canada. She also offered to have a safety tester from McDonald's labs call me to speak to me about the toy. She assured me that noone else has complained about the Hello Kitty toys. I told her that they were only recently released. She said the actual date was July 6. Okay, I stand corrected. I guess 19 days ago is not considered recent. I was most concerned about the amount of paint that was removed through a "normal" mouthing of the toy by a preschooler.
I have to say that I am impressed with this follow-up call and the offer to have a lab tech speak to me. Now, do I take her word for it, or do I have the lab tech call me?